Showing posts with label childhood obesity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label childhood obesity. Show all posts

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Are Ads Featuring Overwieght Children Going Overboard?


Fighting childhood obesity.


Talking about weight is always a touchy issue. It's made even more difficult when the discussion is in reference to children. We all have been made aware of the problems of childhood obesity, but now new ad campaigns are making even those in the health care industry a little uncomfortable.


The ads are part of a campaign called Strong4Life. The ads are based out of Georgia and they urge parents and others to "stop sugarcoating" the problem. The ads feature pictures of overweight kids along with some disturbing messages. Some of the captions are "Warning - It's hard to be a little girl if you're not." and "Mom, why am I fat?". Some of these ads contain text that tell parents that it isn't okay to ignore the problem.


It seems to me that these ads would do more harm than good. Although I understand what they are trying to do with the campaign, I wonder what sort of damage they will cause. As someone who struggled with weight issues as a child, I don't think that humiliating parents and children is the best way to go.


For me, as a child, the message that I was fat and therefore not good enough was one I heard loud and clear. I was put on liquid diets, diet pills and so on. None of it really ever helped me to lose weight, although the years of crash dieting and pills did wreck my metabolism. Although I am not a thin adult, I have managed to learn to be ok with who I am and what I look like.


The people behind the ads say that they are trying to bring the issue to light and find that shock tactics are the best way to get peoples' attention. They are quick to point at some of the anti-smoking and anti-drug ads that have made an impact. While it's true that shock messages can get attention and make people aware of the problem, I don't think it works well in this case.


See, the thing is that fat kids know that they are fat. These ads aren't telling them something they didn't know, they are just making them feel ashamed and telling others that it is ok, and even helpful, to mock and tease them without mercy. It goes back to the idea that being fat is unforgivable and that we all have a responsibility to condemn overweight kids because it's the only way to help them.


The truth is that guilt and shame are poor motivators. In fact, when children are already struggling with low-self esteem, they can do more harm than good. The problem of childhood obesity is a serious one and in order to find a solution, I think we have to stop blaming the kids and their parents and begin to look at the larger picture.


Maybe raising attention to the need to buy more fruit and vegetables, to eat healthy as a family or skip fast food would help. More importantly, we could all start thinking about why so many kids are struggling with this issue. We could talk about how cheap it is to eat unhealthily and how expensive it is to eat a balanced diet. Eating low calorie, organic food should be easy. It is what humans have been living on since the beginning of time. Now, eating a vegetable rich, organic diet requires a lot of money.


I just think that making fun of fat kids isn't the way to make children healthier. Blaming the victim only serves to mask the problem and make children feel as though they are failures. There has to be a better way.


What do you think about these ads? Do you think they work? Why or why not?




By Melissa Kennedy- Melissa is a 9 year blog veteran and a freelance writer for HealthcareJobsiteBlog and Beyond.com.. Along with helping others find the job of their dreams, she enjoys computer geekery, raising a teenager, supporting her local library, writing about herself in the third person and working on her next novel.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

No More Toys For Happy Meals

So, for San Francisco residents, it is the end of an era. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors have recently voted to ban McDonald's Happy Meals, at least in the traditional form. The new ordinance will ban restaurants from offering toys along with meals that contain over 600 calories, and more that 35% of the calories coming from fat. Additionally, the meals must include a fruit or vegetable.

This new ordinance is especially problematic for McDonalds, because a typical Happy Meal (cheeseburger, small fries and a Sprite) contains about 640 calories. According to a spokesperson for McDonald”s:

"We are extremely disappointed with this decision," company spokeswoman Danya Proud said in a statement. "It's not what our customers want, nor is it something they asked for."

McDonald's is concerned because the type of meal that would be required in order to comply with the ordinance is not the sort of meal that most kids want or expect from a fast food restaurant. But to the city, that is the point. Their goal is to encourage healthy eating habits and to prevent rewarding children for bad habits.

While I can understand the intention behind such a ruling, I don't think that it is going to accomplish anything more that lessening children's joy. Most children I know would opt to forgo the toy in order to have their chicken nuggets and french fries. Many fast food restaurants have started offering healthier side options to replace the french fries in their kids meals , even though most kids still want the fries.

What do you think about this attempt to encourage healthier eating habits? Let me know in the comments.

Are you looking for a job in Health Care? Take a look at HealthCareJobSite.

By Melissa Kennedy- Melissa is a 9 year blog veteran and a freelance writer, along with helping others find the job of their dreams, she enjoys computer geekery, raising a teenager, supporting her local library, writing about herself in the third person and working on her next novel.


Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Taxing Sugared Sodas Can Reduce Childhood Obesity, Add Healthcare Jobs

by Alex A. Kecskes


I'm not a big fan of taxing products or services, but adding a tax on high fructose sodas and juice drinks has the double benefit of reducing child and teen obesity and filling state coffers with money for more healthcare workers—like nurses and nutritionists.


I know, it's the nanny state all over again, but with both parents working longer and single parents working two or three jobs to make ends meet, it's hard to constantly control what kids are drinking—especially teens. Kids consume about 50 gallons per person per year of soda and sugar-sweetened beverages, which many doctors and nutritionists contend is a key factor in the rise of childhood obesity.


Studies show that raising the price of sugared drinks can lower consumption. The U.S. Economic Research Service found that a 10% increase in the price of soda would lead to an 8% reduction in consumption among low-income populations.


The penny-per-ounce tax would be imposed on sweetened water, soda, sports drinks, “energy” drinks, colas, sweetened bottled coffee or tea, and sweetened fruit or vegetable drinks containing less than 70% natural fruit or vegetable juice.


An independent analysis of the New York's state budget revealed that failure to pass the proposed soda tax would cost New York City 16,710 healthcare jobs. Conducted by the Greater New York Hospital Association, the study showed that a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages would prevent the "systematic defunding of health care" in New York. The association believes that soda tax revenues--over $500 million annually--would go toward vital health services that could prevent layoffs.


I swore off sugared drinks long ago because I got tired of the "sugar crash" they left me with an hour or so later. And because both my doctor and my dentist advised me to avoid these beverages.


For more information on health careers, visit http://www.healthcarejobsiteblog.com/


Alex A. Kecskes has written hundreds of published articles on health/fitness, "green" issues, TV/film entertainment, restaurant reviews and many other topics. As a former Andy/Belding/One Show ad agency copywriter, he also writes web content, ads, brochures, sales letters, mailers and scripts for national B2B and B2C clients.